PDA

View Full Version : YMMSS Advertising


Dreamer
June 13th, 2005, 03:49 AM
The whole premise of ymmss is that one day, putting it in their words, "advertisers will be clammering to do business with us". The whole idea of being a $10billion driving force would be appealing to advertisers isnt going to work. You dont need a PhD to figure this out. So, if anybody would like to discuss anything releated to advertising on ymmss, positivies or negatives, post here.

There is ultimately 2 reasons why people advertise. Okay, well, 3. The third one I'll discuss first since it doesnt play that big of a role.

1. To get rid of product. If I have a baseball card collection that Im considering tossing, i might put an add in the newspaper to sell them. When a retail business is about to go out of business, they may do some last minute advertising getting rid of their product before they liquidate it out. While this is technically selling product, i put it aside becaue many times people will sell at a big loss just so they dont have to pay for storage fees or throw it away. People that sell this way look for the cheapest available advertising. They dont have time to make up a fancy ad or pay big bucks so everybody can see it. Local newspapers are usually the best or trade related journals. The point is not to turn a profit but to get your ad in front of the likely people who might buy your product.

Now, with businesses they can simply liquidate out their store to a liquidator who might pay 3 cents on the value dollar just so they can sell it out for 10 cents on the dollar to a 99 cent type store who will sell it out for 20 cents on the dollar. That type of money is guaranteed (well, maybe the percentages might be higher or lower, but they can call to get quotes). Now, if a business is going out of business and has a quote for $.05 on the value dollar, would it be worth spending $500 to try to sell to 100k members? Well, even if money might be made, the truth of the matter is its usually crunch time when going out of business, so they simply dont have time for somebody from Nigeria or somewhere else to offer to buy their product.

So, one category down of people who might not use ymmss.

2. Name branding. Everybody knows Nike. Everybody knows the symbol to pepsi. Thats product branding. I think kim alluded to this to convince people that these companies will want to shell out billions to brand their product with ymmss. Well, it doesnt work that way.

People tape tv shows. Even if they edit out the commercials, the potential of commercials longetavitiy is forever. I enjoy watching commercials from the 50s. There are tv shows just devoted to commercials. People watch the superbowl for the commercials. The truth of the matter is, while the 30 second spot is the most important consideration when producing a spot, businesses will go out of their way to insure the longetivity of the commercial, to get people to talk about it, for free advertising.

People actually record radio. Old time radio is popular. are commercials edited out of that? I'm not sure. Old radio jingles are also very popular. Billboards can get recorded on the 6pm news, or by a vacationeer showing everything they saw. People save newspapers for childrens birthdays. Even video games, while advertisers are starting to consider that as a viable means of advertising, i personally still play old coleco vision games and other classics. I still read old comic books showing how you can get your very own binoclears if you sell their envelopes.

In any matter of advertising, there is longetivity. Does that exist on the internet? No. Can anybody remember any significient event on the internet worth remembering? Well...there was that dancing baby of years ago. Now, where they selling anything? I dont know.There are sites that come and go, but there is nothing really rememorable that people will talk about in 50 years and want to have images stored of that one day they visited that one website.

But even while longegativity is not a criteria for product branding, it doesn't hurt. The thing with all of these advertising they are all first hand advertising. You watch the commercials directly, you see the billboard directly. But, before I go on to my next point, There is a potential number of people that might see the tv commercial. That number is all the people who might be watching tv and that station at that time. There is a number of people who might see the billboard based on how busy the highway is on a given day.The potential market though is everybody who owns a tv, a computer, everybody who might ever drive in the state.

Now, what kim is doing is more focused and less successful. I consider it second generation level of advertising, meaning that a certain criteria must be met before somebody might see the ad. Now, i suppose you can argue u need a tv to view a tv commercial, or a raido to listen to a ad, or buy a magazine to read a classified, however, most people have tvs, most have radios, but buy the magazine regardless of the ads.

A second generation ad is something that requires a prerequisit. To view an add on ymmss the people must be members. to view the wall at the baseball game, you need to have purchased the tichets to the game. As i said earlier, companies are considering advertising in video games, placing a pepsi machine somewhere instead of a generic soda machine. But in order to see that soda machine you have to buy the game.

This level of advertising only works for branding. Have a pepsi logo shown at a baseball game and when ur thirsty, it goes from get me a soda to get me a pepsi. Say that enough times, and when you run to the store get me some pepsi. Why wont this work with ymmss? If the video game sells 100k copies, you can safely assume that 100k people will probably see the ad and intereact with it (if its a good ad to intereact with). Same with a baseball stadium. But what is the viewing rate of ymmss? Well, they like to tote around 20,000 members, so 10,000 hours of viewing. But ymmss is not set up for 30mins a week per retail advertisement.

Well, lets be fair before i jump to my conclusion. They are being paid to read advertisements, right? Well, what incentive is there to do their job well? When I was overworked and underpaid i slacked off at work alot. If I was going to get paid either way, the same amount, whether or not the shop was clean or not, the shop stayed dirty when i felt like i wasnt being appreciated.

What incentive is there to read ads at ymmss? u might get paid either way. Well, according to kim, all the members know that by supporting the advertisers they wil advertise more. Well, i'll get into this part later. As of right now there is no incentative to read more than just the same ad week in and week out.

So, ymmss fails on longegativity, copability, and viewability.

3. ROI - The most imporant reason why 95+ plus copanies advertise. Simply put, if i invest $1000 tomorrow with a certain company that promises results, by the time the advertising campaign is over, if I didn't get $1000 plus in sales from that advertiser, i will not use them again. The truth is businesses are the business to make money not to make other people rich by their own poor decisions.

ymmss will fail here also. The math just doesnt work out.

Dreamer
June 13th, 2005, 03:55 AM
I've said this before and i'm sure other people have bought it up because the point is so obvious.

Whe people advertise there is no guarantee success. However, with ymmss, they want to be the next advertising monster, and yet the few people they already bought on board are not advertising but profit sharing.

So, how can anybody trust kims vision of advertisers when he cant even secure one yet? And why is he no longer waiting for 100k/100k, since that was supposed to be the point where advertisers will trip over themselves to shower kim with golld.

Dreamer
June 14th, 2005, 11:12 PM
I think i forgot to mention what the break even point of advertising is. Now, this isnt set in stone because businesses have different plans for their advertising budget, and often the results of an advertising campaign is impossible to measure, because if you get repeat customers that never purchased from you before, their entire purchase fromt he first day they shop with you to the last needs to be considered. And if they bought friends to ur shop. So, this is just a generalization, if numbers are available.

Lets say I spend $1,000 for advertising this year. What is my break even point?

1. $1,000? Anything less than that is just pure loss plain and simple. at $1,000, however, i'm at the exact same point I am before spending the advertising dollars, except minus inventory. Now, if your a service provider where the inputs dont cost you anything, than $1,000 might be your break even point. But, even than you woudl want to consider labor prices, etc.

2. $2,000 asumming 100% markup of cost? That means I spent $1,000 on my product, spent $1,000 on my advertising, and i"m at the exact same point. Now, this might be considered the break even point. But, now your missing opporuntiy loss, meaning you would have been better off putting that advertising budget to more productive means to get increased sales. In fact, spending the extra $1,000 on more product might infact actually increase sales just by it self if I chose the correct product.

3. Other? This is in fact the correct answer. Each business person will calculate what the minimum amount of markup they would be willing to sell the product for in order to make the sale. For instance, a product that costs $1 to purchase wholesale might be resold for $2. The business may decide to give 15% off to good repeat customers ($1.70), and maybe 25% off to special customers who maybe big spenders ($1.50). The minimum amount a business will probably settle for a sale for advertising might be what they offer their own employees. So, if employee discount is 35% off, $1.30 would be the minimum they would expect to sell a product. If somebody offers $1.25 for this $2 item, they will refuse the sale.

So, at a 30% markup on cost for the minimum to sell a product, the break even point will be:

( Advertising Revenues - Advertising Cost ) / Product cost = Minimum Markup
AR = 2PC
( 2PC - AC ) / PC = MM
( 2PC - 1000 ) / PC = 1.35 (using example numbers)
2PC - 1000 = 1.35 PC
.65 PC = 1000
PC = $1500
AR = $3000 ( $1000 for advertising, $1500 for Product cost, $500 profit)

So, break even point is about $3000, anything less than that is not worth the advertising.

Now, same break even point, but this time I am not going to pay advertising fees, but I will profit share at 50%.

There is no break even point for the business since there is no upfront cost. But, what is the break even point of the consumer who is wanting money to go into accounts payable? Keeping the same 35% markup, double that to 70% so i can share the 35%.

Profit Shared = [ ( product cost * 1.7 ) - product cost ] /2
$1,000 = .7PC / 2
$2,000 = .7PC
$2,800 = PC
So, Advertising Revenue has to equal clost to $5,000 for the members to see $1,000 coming out of my pocket.

This is why profit sharing will only hurt the members. they are better off keeping the money in the system. Advertisers, on the other hand will have a bigger impact, but it is still impossible for any one advertiser to continue with this site because they will not make their money.

Of course these simple calculations are based on the pricing strategies, I would assume, of most small businesses. Bigger businesses, because they buy in bulk, can have a markup of as little as 10% or even less

surfer
June 22nd, 2005, 09:23 AM
You make some good points Dreamer.

I don't think that online incentivized ad reading is the wave of the future either. :shake: It is not targeted advertising and the YMMSS member base is still small and scattered. Not worth much to any sizeable companies.

Don't forget to keep up with Mike Hamilton's work at http://www.ymsurveys.com

One thing Mike is saying he will attempt is to sell the YMMSS membership as a focus group to clients. Since advertising to the YMMSS members isn't worth much at this point, it might not be a bad idea to offer up lowball focus group pricing to squeeze a few bucks into the CPA.

Gringo
June 22nd, 2005, 12:22 PM
I don't think that online incentivized ad reading is the wave of the future either. Exactly, in fact it's in the dead past. Been tried for a number of years now, and it simply doesn't work. Most of the advertisers in paid to read ads are other paid to read ad companies, marginal business opportunities, and the like. It seems like a huge number of YMMSS members are totally naive in believing Kim and Mark's nonsense about YMMSS making millions or billions of dollars with this already proven ineffective medium.

Don't forget to keep up with Mike Hamilton's work at http://www.ymsurveys.com
I found this quote from the above site amusing:
I believe you will be excited to know how valuable a product you currently hold, and its true value.
I do know the true value of an EPC and I'm not too excited. The true value of a product/service is what someone is willing to pay for it on the open market. My $10 EPCs sell for 1 cent on the YMMSS auction site. So I overpaid by what, 1000% or it's lost 99.9% of the value.

200_K_already
June 22nd, 2005, 06:14 PM
I do know the true value of an EPC and I'm not too excited. The true value of a product/service is what someone is willing to pay for it on the open market. My $10 EPCs sell for 1 cent on the YMMSS auction site. So I overpaid by what, 1000% or it's lost 99.9% of the value.

That was dumb! Are you sure your cut out for business?

Dreamer
June 22nd, 2005, 07:09 PM
Why was that dumb? I think it was a very astute observation.

200_K_already
June 22nd, 2005, 07:26 PM
you would

Gringo
June 22nd, 2005, 08:55 PM
That was dumb! Are you sure your cut out for business?

Yes it was dumb to buy something for $10 when I could have bought it for 1 or even 10 cents. Everyone that continues to buy EPCs for $10 is doing this same dumb thing. That's my point.

According to the new EPC salesman:
The EPCs of and by themselves DO NOT currently purchase you positions that mature in the 'cycle' or Commissions Payable Account.That happens to be a nice, ( very nice ), side benefit.

So the main purpose of buying an EPC is to use it to advertise. That being the case, paying $10 for advertising that is fair market valued at 10 cents or less is an incredibly dumb move. That's why I'm not not cut out for this type of rip off and why YMMSS will never generate significant ad income.

concerned
June 23rd, 2005, 12:37 PM
That was dumb! Are you sure your cut out for business?

Since when is an internet get rich quick scheme considered a "business"?

200_K_already
June 23rd, 2005, 07:21 PM
you r brainless

jokach
June 23rd, 2005, 08:14 PM
200_K_already

You have been warned about thread hijacking, and now about insulting other forum members. Keep the conversation on topic and not personal. This is not a free-for-all.

This is your last warning.

jokach
(admin)

concerned
June 24th, 2005, 11:47 AM
you r brainless

That is the last straw. You are now banned.

sisco50
June 24th, 2005, 04:46 PM
lol What took so long? I can spot a TROLL after the first post usually. :) Just kidding. I know we all rate warnings; even the TROLLS. :)

Dreamer
June 24th, 2005, 05:44 PM
Ok, this has nothing to do with advertising, so I apoligies to myself since I started the thread.

Its unfortunate. He seemed so pro-ymmss. So, instead of acting like a child with childish name calling and just being stupid, why didnt he take the time out to show how our logic and reasoning are wrong? Would he have changed my mind? Probably not. But, I would have loved to be able to debate a pro-ymmsser on even grounds knowing that my post wont get deleted nor will his post get deleted.

I heard horror stories about MW in the beginning who deleted pro-matrix people, etc. But, at least now adays I think they are more tolerable of people with different opinions and viewpoints.