PDA

View Full Version : YM FORUM - EDITED FOR CONTENT


spdrvii
July 29th, 2005, 02:37 PM
Hi :applause:

mercinary
July 29th, 2005, 02:48 PM
You're welcome. That is what M.W. is all about. You know that when a company/organization you are involved with starts deleting and editing comments, that there something very fishy going on. We had a lot of experience with this in the Matrix world (before it collapsed). It is obvious that someone doesn't want the truth let out!

As for people arguing with you in this, we can't stop that either. :)

-Merc

lettie
July 29th, 2005, 06:51 PM
I have listened to a number of YMMSS conference calls and have NEVER heard Kim state exactly what the formula would be for the weighting of positions. I listened to the call last night and heard Mark give suggestions as to how it would probably happen but why don't you wait for the final formula before you say it is not what was expected. If you were the gentleman on the call I thought you kept interrupting Mark so that it was difficult for him to try and explain what the current thinking is.


Lettie

surfer
July 29th, 2005, 07:29 PM
I listened to the call last night and heard Mark give suggestions as to how it would probably happen but why don't you wait for the final formula before you say it is not what was expected.

Lettie

I know people are chomping at the bit for
whatever information they can get lettie,
but why on earth would one of the key
personnel of YMMSS be giving suggestions
as to "how it would probably happen"?

If he doesn't know then he should just say
we're still waiting for Kim, no matter how
much disappointment that may cause in the
YMMSS herd.

For all the communication avenues that
YMMSS has set up, they continue to mis-
communicate quite often.

BTW spdrvii, welcome to Matrix Watch.

lettie
July 29th, 2005, 09:12 PM
The problem as I see it is people want exact details, yet they have been told these would not be available until closer to the transition period. But, they continue to ask the question and then get upset when they don't get an answer down to the fraction of a % as to how the weighting will work. Kim has given an indication and Mark has as well, by saying they would be weighted according to how long they have been in the system, and then the smaller positions would continue to cyle at 90 day periods, and the $320 positions would pay a weekly amount. Kim has always stated that the weighting will be fair to everyone. So, why doesn't everyone "weight" until the transition happens. They will have more than enough time to complain then.

Lettie

surfer
July 29th, 2005, 09:25 PM
So, why doesn't everyone "weight" until the transition happens. They will have more than enough time to complain then.

Lettie

We may not agree about much lettie, but we
agree in this case.

Even though I'm chomping at the bit to get
to work on breaking down the new system,
I'm just hanging out until I see full details,
the supposed controls(10% drop, 25% rise),
etc. before I give it a whirl. :)

But that is why Mark should not attempt to
give any details that he can't give with any
certainty because it just causes confusion.

When you are in a leadership position, you
don't give out half-assed information just
because your subjects are restless.

As has been stated on the YMForums, Kim
made this announcement a little prematurely.
He should have waited until he was a little
further along with it. But, he is desperate
to get momentum back.

Back to the topic of editing in the YMForums.

In this case, Viper may have over edited just
a tad. But we all know that they aren't going
to allow subtle insults of YMMSS admin.

There have been worse cases than this particular
one.