Leonidas
August 23rd, 2005, 11:49 PM
Mr. Esto. I have been very patient and asked my questions many times in other threads and you have replied to others in the thread but continue not to respond to my post. So I decided to make a post just for you. Please answer my questions below. Thank you.
1. If the 90 million that is claimed to have cycled is actually the same as being paid out since it is claimed that real money was used, then how can taxes not be paid on this "real" money?
2. If an EPC is an actual product with a real value of $10 then why are there no refunds? Seems to me that if you have never cycled and never used your EPC's for advertising you have gained no service from YMMSS and therefore should be able to return your EPC. If they are actually worth something, then why wouldn't Kim be happy to take them back and refund members money??
I look forward to your reply.
L
1. If the 90 million that is claimed to have cycled is actually the same as being paid out since it is claimed that real money was used, then how can taxes not be paid on this "real" money?
2. If an EPC is an actual product with a real value of $10 then why are there no refunds? Seems to me that if you have never cycled and never used your EPC's for advertising you have gained no service from YMMSS and therefore should be able to return your EPC. If they are actually worth something, then why wouldn't Kim be happy to take them back and refund members money??
I look forward to your reply.
L