View Full Version : Kimmy,s done nothing wrong!
foolmeonce
November 2nd, 2006, 11:36 AM
On the Oct. 31 Q and A, someone asked Kim if he or any of the officers in STA YMMSS wera being investagated. He said not to our knowledge. And he said they had done nothing wrong to warrent an investagation. I would give the thousands I have lost to see them put cuffs on that fat basterd.
coralal
November 2nd, 2006, 12:22 PM
On the Oct. 31 Q and A, someone asked Kim if he or any of the officers in STA YMMSS wera being investagated. He said not to our knowledge. And he said they had done nothing wrong to warrent an investagation. I would give the thousands I have lost to see them put cuffs on that fat basterd.
We could give many reason why they should, but the bottom line is that I believe that they are not being investigated as of yet and that is a tradegy. I can not believe how Kim got away with runninng a doubler ponzi bringing in millions for 3 years and trhe authorities have done nothing. This was one of the biggest scams on the internet. Even Esto said it was a get Rich Quick Scheme.:flame: :swear: :head:
drankoolaid
November 2nd, 2006, 12:24 PM
Hi There,
Well that was pretty arrogant of him eh?
I suspect it won't be much longer before that
tune changes --
You do realize of course this pretty much cuts refunds out.
Best Regards,
Michael
PS - he fooled me once too!
Gringo
November 2nd, 2006, 01:48 PM
And he said they had done nothing wrong to warrent an investagation.If someone posts a question mentioning "bait and switch" I wonder if Inman would still deny doing anything wrong.
drankoolaid
November 2nd, 2006, 04:50 PM
Hi There,
Yes he'll deny bait and switch.
In my opinion I could care less about
HIS opinion as we have all pretty much
seen the result of his PAST opinions
[opinions he once presented as facts]
I'm quite sure when Mr Ken Lay and
chronies were at first questioned they
did nothing wrong either [in their opinion]
Actually I really don't believe this is Mr Inman's
real opinion anyways -- Hell what else are you
gonna say when caught with hand in major cookie jar.
No sports fan's I wouldn't count on any instant
admission of wrong doing. Hell if I were counseling
him [as an attorney] I sure wouldn't want
him confessing and doing mia culpa all over the place.
Best Regards,
Michael
boatman189
November 2nd, 2006, 06:09 PM
Hi There,
Yes he'll deny bait and switch.
In my opinion I could care less about
HIS opinion as we have all pretty much
seen the result of his PAST opinions
[opinions he once presented as facts]
I'm quite sure when Mr Ken Lay and
chronies were at first questioned they
did nothing wrong either [in their opinion]
Actually I really don't believe this is Mr Inman's
real opinion anyways -- Hell what else are you
gonna say when caught with hand in major cookie jar.
No sports fan's I wouldn't count on any instant
admission of wrong doing. Hell if I were counseling
him [as an attorney] I sure wouldn't want
him confessing and doing mia culpa all over the place.
Best Regards,
Michael
I agree he is just posturing, he would be an idiot to admit in a public forum wrong doing, I'm sure however he is feeling the pressure, he can't even keep the die hearts from complaining anymore. Nothing he has promised has ever come true and anything he has done was to simply further the ponzi or for him to avoid paying taxes on his ill gotten gains.
It is sicking that he is a free man, eating apparently many of those Omaha steaks they tried to sell all the while hurting so many, destroying peoples lives and dreams . It is even more sickening that in his latest news letter he is still at it, trying to use the, "we are family card" in order to bleed the remaining devotees with the promise of future success...
RighteousAnger
November 3rd, 2006, 11:56 AM
We know of ONE investigation that IS taking place "as we speak."
And, our source for that factoid is <I>infinitely</I> more credible than Kim Inman will ever dream of being. <gag> If he can't withstand OUR questions, what's he gonna do about theirs? Or a judges'? Or those of an official from the IRS?
<b>BTW, regarding the IRS, I hope you're all claiming the perfectly legitimate (not to mention, appropriate) "theft loss" as recommended by WLD.</b> Icing on the cake: additional light on Mr. Inman's shady dealings.
Seriously, can't you just see Kim's jaw quivering now? He knows damn well he underestimated at least some of his "congregation." PRICELESS! :lol:
She may appear to be taking baby steps, but Lady Justice is on her way, folks. :applause:
Golfer2
November 3rd, 2006, 12:05 PM
Thanks RA. Keep up the good work. You are much appreciated.
SickOfScams
November 4th, 2006, 07:27 AM
The thing that worries me is that if you do get him investigated via SEC and FBI the same will happen as 12DP and it's 300,000 members that Claris Johnston crooked and guess what she is now a friend of the "Feds" helping them with other internet scams and they are allowing her $5000 per month of our money to live on. She also recruited as a "Christian".
So I like your idea of the IRS. If they could put Al Capone in jail they might just get Kim and his merry men and women there as well.
Intepol are also a good idea as being the International Police he could not run anywhere and not be found and they have a far better conviction record than the FBI.
coralal
November 4th, 2006, 11:23 AM
The thing that worries me is that if you do get him investigated via SEC and FBI the same will happen as 12DP and it's 300,000 members that Claris Johnston crooked and guess what she is now a friend of the "Feds" helping them with other internet scams and they are allowing her $5000 per month of our money to live on. She also recruited as a "Christian".
So I like your idea of the IRS. If they could put Al Capone in jail they might just get Kim and his merry men and women there as well.
Intepol are also a good idea as being the International Police he could not run anywhere and not be found and they have a far better conviction record than the FBI.
Where is your proof that the FBI is paying Claris Johnson 5000 a month.
Please give us the proof, because if we are going to make statements like
that we need the proof to back it up.
SickOfScams
November 4th, 2006, 01:07 PM
It was of public record as far as I remember from the hearings at that time (I think it was North Carolina where 12DP was situated but not sure), and discussed at the time in many surfing forums. Most of us believed in Claris at the time and thought things would come right in a few months so I know I didn't bother to keep records.
At the end of the hearings a Receiver TL Lennon was appointed to try and sort the mess out. Lots of us thought at the time there would be a regular court case and things would be sorted out one way or another but that was not to be.
We were recently sent the latest update from the Receiver about a Hearing November 27, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., United States District Court for the Central District of California, for an amount of $637,273.15 for the 1st Interim fees for the Receiver and other Professionals involved in trying to sort it out.
I doubt I will be around by the time it is sorted out so have just accepted I have lost it all.
coralal
November 4th, 2006, 05:09 PM
It was of public record as far as I remember from the hearings at that time (I think it was North Carolina where 12DP was situated but not sure), and discussed at the time in many surfing forums. Most of us believed in Claris at the time and thought things would come right in a few months so I know I didn't bother to keep records.
At the end of the hearings a Receiver TL Lennon was appointed to try and sort the mess out. Lots of us thought at the time there would be a regular court case and things would be sorted out one way or another but that was not to be.
We were recently sent the latest update from the Receiver about a Hearing November 27, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., United States District Court for the Central District of California, for an amount of $637,273.15 for the 1st Interim fees for the Receiver and other Professionals involved in trying to sort it out.
I doubt I will be around by the time it is sorted out so have just accepted I have lost it all.
Charis is not getting 5000 a month at all. All her accounts are frozen and she is receiving no money at all. No one else will see any money as well. It was an incredible Ponzi Scheme that she had going.
Casandra
November 4th, 2006, 05:41 PM
Charis is not getting 5000 a month at all. All her accounts are frozen and she is receiving no money at all. No one else will see any money as well. It was an incredible Ponzi Scheme that she had going.
I will beg to differ on two points. I read on her own journal page
charisjohnson.com Thu 13 Apr 2006 12:59 PM EDT (the page contains different material now) the following quote from Charis Johnson herself:
The $5000 a month I am received is coming directly from my own personal bank accounts which were frozen. This money includes the life savings of myself and my husband as well as salary he received from his employer which had nothing to do with my former company. So we are not being given anybody's money but our own. And my attorney has not received a dime from the SEC and won't unless another party sees fit to give up the money they continue to hold. As well, the $10,000 is meant to be a one time payment if and when it occurs, not a monthly payment. These payments only come at all because I was never legally charged with any wrong doing and I formally neither admitted nor denied any of the allegations in the original complaint.
coralal
November 4th, 2006, 07:30 PM
I will beg to differ on two points. I read on her own journal page
charisjohnson.com Thu 13 Apr 2006 12:59 PM EDT (the page contains different material now) the following quote from Charis Johnson herself:
Exactly my point. The money was her husband and hers before and nothing to do with 12DP. So the FBI are not paying her 5000 a month. You said that they were paying her 5000 a month from our money, meaning yours, which is not the case.
Casandra
November 4th, 2006, 09:29 PM
Exactly my point. The money was her husband and hers before and nothing to do with 12DP. So the FBI are not paying her 5000 a month. You said that they were paying her 5000 a month from our money, meaning yours, which is not the case.Now I have to differ with this. It was SickOfScams (not me) who said:
she is now a friend of the "Feds" helping them with other internet scams and they are allowing her $5000 per month of our money to live on.
Please note that it was said that Feds are "allowing her....of our money".
The presumption being made was that any money she possessed would be fair
game to reimburse losses of 12DP money. Actually, only a judge could make
that determination. This is most likely why her accounts are frozen, don't
you think?
To keep to subject, if STA were being investigated, the Feds would most
likely also freeze all assets of STA Admin until all the money had been
followed.
Arzel
November 5th, 2006, 01:37 AM
Now I have to differ with this. It was SickOfScams (not me) who said:
Please note that it was said that Feds are "allowing her....of our money".
The presumption being made was that any money she possessed would be fair
game to reimburse losses of 12DP money. Actually, only a judge could make
that determination. This is most likely why her accounts are frozen, don't
you think?
To keep to subject, if STA were being investigated, the Feds would most
likely also freeze all assets of STA Admin until all the money had been
followed.
I am not an expert, but I would think that they (whomever is running the scam) would be allowed some ammount of money from their personal accounts for living expenses and other expenses related to defending themselves against any legal proceedings. Even the dimmest scammer would most likely set up some sort of corporation to try and shield themselves from liability, and these accounts (which are the ones referenced in the 12DP if I understand the situation correctly) would be frozen upon investigation.
So in the case of YMMSS, I would suspect that YMMSS funds would be frozen when it reaches that point, and Kimmy would have limits placed upon his personal accounts during legal proceedings. I would also suspect that he has moved most of his money offshore or tried to hide it in some other manner, but in this world of digital communications it will probably be an easy trail to follow.
SickOfScams
November 5th, 2006, 02:53 AM
I must search a bit in the week and see if I can find the Charis info.
The one thing that worries me is that with all the money Kim has, that he has got the best legal representation that money can buy. We know with some court cases we have seen in recent years that people got off even murder due to excellent council.
SickOfScams
November 5th, 2006, 03:28 AM
Found something referring to Charis and the $5000.
February 28, 2006, United States District Court for the Central District of California (the "District Court") issued a Permanent Injunction at the request of the United States Securities & Exchange Commission (the "Commission") and with the consent of Charis Johnson. Under the Permanent Injunction Order, Thomas F. Lennon (the "Receiver") was appointed by the District Court as permanent receiver for Lifeclicks, LLC and 12Daily Pro. At the same time, the District Court froze the assets of 12Daily Pro and Lifeclicks and the personal assets of Charis Johnson, subject to cost of living allowance of $5,000 per month. The Receiver has full authority and control over the operations of Lifeclicks and 12Daily Pro and all of their assets wherever located.
RighteousAnger
November 5th, 2006, 01:00 PM
The one thing that worries me is that with all the money Kim has, that he has got the best legal representation that money can buy. We know with some court cases we have seen in recent years that people got off even murder due to excellent council.
SOS, there is always that chance, but keep in mind the Ponzi operators in Riverside CA who were recently sentenced to approximately 5 yrs. each. :applause:
Inman, et al - if (when) sentenced - will probably get a longer term because it's so obvious that he's trying to cover YMMSS with STA. AND in the Riverside case, there were "only" about 500 victims. :eek:
coralal
November 5th, 2006, 02:16 PM
SOS, there is always that chance, but keep in mind the Ponzi operators in Riverside CA who were recently sentenced to approximately 5 yrs. each. :applause:
Inman, et al - if (when) sentenced - will probably get a longer term because it's so obvious that he's trying to cover YMMSS with STA. AND in the Riverside case, there were "only" about 500 victims. :eek:
Ia m going to bet right now that Inman does not get caught and in the first part of 2007 , he sails off into the sunset with his millions. The reason I say this is that there is no push by anyone to bring him to justice. Out of the 25000 people that put money into his doubler ponzi sheme , only a handful ( little over 100 ) that even have come forward to critizice Inman or even file a letter or email to the authorities.
The only way you get the Autorities to bring action against YMMSS or any company is to contact every media outlet in the United Staes and talk to every news person that will listen to you. Once this happens, then and only then will the feds jump on it, as the feds to not like the media out there talking about scams that they have not investigated.
RighteousAnger
November 5th, 2006, 03:57 PM
Coralal, it was explained to you just a couple of days ago in a different thread, that there IS an investigation being conducted. Additionally, this investigation is a result of ONE person engaging a lawfirm with international jurisdiction.
Also, if Inman is no more on the ball than Gary Harvey (see my sig), the trail will be easy to follow. ;)
coralal
November 5th, 2006, 08:03 PM
Coralal, it was explained to you just a couple of days ago in a different thread, that there IS an investigation being conducted. Additionally, this investigation is a result of ONE person engaging a lawfirm with international jurisdiction.
Also, if Inman is no more on the ball than Gary Harvey (see my sig), the trail will be easy to follow. ;)
I understand that it was said in another thread, but I will tell you that Law Firms do not do Investigations. Only FTC and FBI and local authorities, so until I see something from those authorities, I will not be convinced that an investigations is being done by the proper authorities.
sisco50
November 6th, 2006, 08:56 AM
I understand that it was said in another thread, but I will tell you that Law Firms do not do Investigations. Only FTC and FBI and local authorities, so until I see something from those authorities, I will not be convinced that an investigations is being done by the proper authorities.
The proper authorities can be a real puzzler at times. This would depend greatly on location of the scam I would think. Type of scam as well.
I believe that lawfirms can initiate investigations by the same methods as any private citizen can. But it helps to know who the "proper authorities" are in order to get this done.
Gringo
November 6th, 2006, 11:24 AM
Depends on what you mean by "Investigations." Law firms will certainly conduct investigations as to the facts of a situation when they are doing research for a defendant. These investigations may or may not ultimately result in a suit being filed.
Government authorities will conduct investigations when they suspect a law has been broken. As with attornies, they may or may not take further legal action depending upon the facts discovered. Generally, they don't publicly annouce the fact that they are conducting an investigation if they think that it would jepordize the research.
We really can't say at this point one way or another if the goverment is looking at shutting STA down. Just know that as coralal said, the more publicity, the faster the authorities will move.
RighteousAnger
November 6th, 2006, 02:12 PM
Coralal, I nominate you Head Rooftop Shouter. IF YOU will do all YOU can do, there WILL be at least ONE person pushing to bring Inman to justice. ;)
Like bringing WLD (and yes, attorneys hiring private investigators is absolutely routine) on board, a LOT can be accomplished by just one person. You could very well break THAT door down by contacting the right media source with credible preparations. GO FOR IT! :)
"Never give up, NEVER surrender!" ~~ Galaxy Quest motto
"Git'r done!" ~~ Larry the Cable Guy
Sorry for coming off as defensive, but I am aware of several very pro-active YMMSS survivors who quietly dedicate a LOT of time and effort to this cause, never being privy to the inside status of the situation. For instance, at one time, Concreteman paid a full time secretary to do nothing but seek publicity. THANK YOU, CONCRETEMAN! And thank you Coralal, for taking the torch. Progress happens one step at a time, if we just keep steppin.' :)
coralal
November 6th, 2006, 02:21 PM
Coralal, I nominate you Head Rooftop Shouter. IF YOU will do all YOU can do, there WILL be at least ONE person pushing to bring Inman to justice. ;)
Like bringing WLD (and yes, attorneys hiring private investigators is absolutely routine) on board, a LOT can be accomplished by just one person. You could very well break THAT door down by contacting the right media source with credible preparations. GO FOR IT! :)
"Never give up, NEVER surrender!" ~~ Galaxy Quest motto
"Git'r done!" ~~ Larry the Cable Guy
Sorry for coming off as defensive, but I am aware of several very pro-active YMMSS survivors who quietly dedicate a LOT of time and effort to this cause, never being privy to the inside status of the situation. For instance, at one time, Concreteman paid a full time secretary to do nothing but seek publicity. THANK YOU, CONCRETEMAN! And thank you Coralal, for taking the torch. Progress happens one step at a time, if we just keep steppin.' :)
If I had money invested in YMMSS and had been fed all the BS that those IBA's have been for over two years now, I would be contacting every media outlook in any country I could, especially in the United States and in The State of Indianna where Mr Inman lives. I do hope that the thousands of YMMSS members that have lost thousand shout from the roof tops and contact every media outlet, all state and Government Law enforcement and also contact your Governor, Senate leader, congressman.
I work 16 hours a day to make sure my businesses work properly and so I really do not have that much time and also I live in Canada, so I really do not have much time, but anything I can do , just ask.
By the way I do have the connection to the fellow Media fellow that blew the whistle on 12daily pro.
RighteousAnger
November 6th, 2006, 02:39 PM
Coralal, very exciting about your media contact - might you have time to write him? Or, send me a pm with his contact info. :)
Do you mean to say that you have nothing financially invested in YMMSS/STA?
coralal
November 6th, 2006, 03:22 PM
Coralal, very exciting about your media contact - might you have time to write him? Or, send me a pm with his contact info. :)
Do you mean to say that you have nothing financially invested in YMMSS/STA?
I will look up the info and get it to you.
No I have no investment in YMMSS
RighteousAnger
November 6th, 2006, 03:44 PM
Well, that makes your assistance even more greatly appreciated - at least by Yours Truly. :)
ferlando
November 8th, 2006, 08:41 AM
How did you get your money back from YM Corlal ???
coralal
November 8th, 2006, 11:03 AM
How did you get your money back from YM Corlal ???
I never had any of my own money in the deal. My business partner did tho.
I was never that stupid.
Casandra
November 8th, 2006, 11:23 AM
Early on it was possible to "claim by website" and get money back from YMMSS. I joined early enough that I was able to get my initial money back and left their money in the system to grow. All it has managed to do is generate enough in the system to provide a nice sized 1099 for this year's taxes.
hmmm... now that WAC's have been officially downgraded in value, is it $10 per WAC or $2.50 for the 1099? Mine will still probably be over the $600 limit to trigger that cute little feature.
Somebody please ask this in the list of quesitons for Mike! :head:
coralal
November 8th, 2006, 12:53 PM
Early on it was possible to "claim by website" and get money back from YMMSS. I joined early enough that I was able to get my initial money back and left their money in the system to grow. All it has managed to do is generate enough in the system to provide a nice sized 1099 for this year's taxes.
hmmm... now that WAC's have been officially downgraded in value, is it $10 per WAC or $2.50 for the 1099? Mine will still probably be over the $600 limit to trigger that cute little feature.
Somebody please ask this in the list of quesitons for Mike! :head:
The Purchase Value of the WAC's is still 10.65, it is just that you can advertise 75 % more with your WAC's
concerned
November 8th, 2006, 01:51 PM
The Purchase Value of the WAC's is still 10.65, it is just that you can advertise 75 % more with your WAC's
That doesn't matter. They still devalued them by allowing advertising to need less of them.
Casandra
November 8th, 2006, 02:45 PM
I guess the question is:
Is the value of a WAC determined by the dollar cost or by the market value?
If I try to sell a WAC in the market, how much can I get for it? What are people getting for them in classified ads today vs yesterday? Are they selling at all? If they are still not selling, that implies a zero value. Has anyone been successful in selling their WAC's to third parties for ad placements? If so, what price did they fetch? That would be their market value.
coralal
November 8th, 2006, 03:06 PM
I guess the question is:
Is the value of a WAC determined by the dollar cost or by the market value?
If I try to sell a WAC in the market, how much can I get for it? What are people getting for them in classified ads today vs yesterday? Are they selling at all? If they are still not selling, that implies a zero value. Has anyone been successful in selling their WAC's to third parties for ad placements? If so, what price did they fetch? That would be their market value.
The answer to that Question, is they are worth A BIG FAT 0. You could not give them away.
RighteousAnger
November 8th, 2006, 03:40 PM
I never had any of my own money in the deal. My business partner did tho.
I was never that stupid.
Dude, if you really want to help, demoralization ... doesn't.
coralal
November 8th, 2006, 03:52 PM
Dude, if you really want to help, demoralization ... doesn't.
Please do not call me a DUDE. When I said I was not that stupid, I meant it. After doing my do deligence in looking at YMMSS , I said I would be stupid to put any money into a doubler Ponzi scheme.
So I meant it when I said I ( and i mean I , no one else ) would not be that Stupid, I am not referring to anyone that joined, because probably they did not have the info I had and if they had they probably would not have put money in. I feel for every single person that ripped of by Kimmy.
So please do not think that I think anyone was stupid that put money into kimmy's scam.
itstheone
November 9th, 2006, 04:26 PM
Just been posted, wonder if it'll get an answer :rolleyes:
teeoff
Experienced -Over 25 posts
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Last Visit: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 70
Topics: 23
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: The right to know!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there legal action pending against Kim and STA? I feel as IBA's we have a right to know. If this is deleted without an answer, I will look elsewhere. It's a simple question, yes or no.
coralal
November 9th, 2006, 05:22 PM
Just been posted, wonder if it'll get an answer :rolleyes:
teeoff
Experienced -Over 25 posts
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Last Visit: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 70
Topics: 23
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: The right to know!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there legal action pending against Kim and STA? I feel as IBA's we have a right to know. If this is deleted without an answer, I will look elsewhere. It's a simple question, yes or no.
That question was asked of Kim last week and he said no there no investigation that he knows off.
skippy
November 9th, 2006, 11:25 PM
Yes. You're right. He did answer it and in those exact words.
In my opinion he used to many words to give the simplest of answers which generally gives us a reasonable view of a persons propensity to lean toward or away from honesty.
My conclusion?
He's lying!
Golfer2
November 10th, 2006, 01:22 AM
He has lied about everything else. I don't believe this one is any different.:rant:
SpidrVII
November 12th, 2006, 03:29 AM
http://s141.photobucket.com/albums/r43/YMScreenshots
Hey RighteousAnger,
You've got to post how you are able to archive files in this way. I usually archive by using .mht files, but this is another great way to save the webpages...in picture format!
By the way, rest assured that these files (with special emphasis on YMMSSNutshell10 and YMMSSNutshell11) have been sent to the proper investigating authorities). Some of which ol' Kimmy already knows about (Yea, Kimmy! We've got your number!). Some of which ol' Kimmy doesn't (Yea, Kimmy! They've got your number...and they know what you've done!!!).
What you don't know will bite you...in the end.
I wish I would have seen and put the underlined statements together. I could have put two and two together and realized that this was a member-paying-member scam. I mean, co'mon...when this person states, "If you let one $320 purchase cycle without claiming payments, in just three cycles it will generate $640 ...then $1280 ... then $2560 back into the system to pay other members. This is real money which, instead of being paid out, is fed back into the system" and "outgoing payments are funded by the incoming payments", IT'S QUITE OBVIOUS THAT KIM INMAN TOOK YOUR/OUR UNCLAIMED MONEY AND PAID IT OUT TO THE OTHER MEMBERS - LEAVING YOU/US EMPTY PROMISES OF IMAGINARY CASHFLOW!!!
BTW, who's the original author of this web posting? I would like to know so I can send along their name for being an accomplice (if 'They' already don't have their name).
SpidrVII
RighteousAnger
November 12th, 2006, 11:39 AM
Gladly, SpidrVII!
I just find the webpage and navigate so that the part I want to capture is displayed on my screen. Then Ctrl/Alt/PrntScrn (print screen, upper right territory of the keyboard somewhere, I don't have my glasses on, but it is abreviated PrntScrn or something like that - and it copies the pic of the webpage to your clipboard). Open Paint and click paste, save as jpg. Voila!
One problem is that it will capture only what's on your screen, so for this project it was a matter of capture/save, scroll down, capture/save the next section, etc. Result, puzzle pieces. I screenshotted them in anticipation of G.Harvey employing bots. But, if he hasn't yet done so, it's much quicker and easier to print the pages if you can view them yourself. There are quite a few listed here, dunno how many still pertain to our cause, but if you find one, print it up and send it in! :D http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://thispaysbig.com
And about the author/accomplice, I assume you refer to the ThisPaysBig pages. To my knowledge, it's none other than Gary Harvey. And remember, this was one of only 2-3 "officially YMMSS-approved" promo sites.
SpidrVII
November 12th, 2006, 10:37 PM
Gladly, SpidrVII!
I just find the webpage and navigate so that the part I want to capture is displayed on my screen. Then Ctrl/Alt/PrntScrn (print screen, upper right territory of the keyboard somewhere, I don't have my glasses on, but it is abreviated PrntScrn or something like that - and it copies the pic of the webpage to your clipboard). Open Paint and click paste, save as jpg. Voila!
Thanks, RighteousAnger! That's pretty cool. I'll be adding this method to my "bag of tricks"!
SpidrVII
isurrender
November 13th, 2006, 07:59 AM
If you believe in WLD will save you, you probably are still waiting for WMD in Iraq. I think this group who seems to have been scammed by everyone on the internet needs a new forum. How about get a life?
boatman189
November 13th, 2006, 09:51 AM
If you believe in WLD will save you, you probably are still waiting for WMD in Iraq. I think this group who seems to have been scammed by everyone on the internet needs a new forum. How about get a life?
I think most simply want justice, only the die hard's believe that anything will, "save" them.
What kind of human being would come into a victims forum and try to insult ....... the victims?
It does seem like someone indeed need's a , "life".
Webwatch
November 13th, 2006, 10:17 AM
If you believe in WLD will save you, you probably are still waiting for WMD in Iraq. I think this group who seems to have been scammed by everyone on the internet needs a new forum. How about get a life?Its been a while since we have had a Kim Inman supporter join us.
If you are involved in YMMSS isurrender then please consider yourself already a member of the group scammed by Kim Inman, you just don't know it yet.
Click on any link in my signature to post your losses :) or keep believing, the choice is yours.
As most YMMSS/STA cheerleaders are nearly extinct its refreshing to get one to stop by. Right Dinker;)
Gilbert
November 13th, 2006, 11:37 AM
If you believe in WLD will save you, you probably are still waiting for WMD in Iraq. I think this group who seems to have been scammed by everyone on the internet needs a new forum. How about get a life?
If you believe in PPUV will save you, you probably are still waiting for 1 tenth of a cent per ad credit in Indiana before 2015. I think this remaining group of Jim Jones disciple types needs a new forum. How about MatrixWatch?
The fat lady is warming up her tonsils.
boatman189
November 13th, 2006, 02:48 PM
If you believe in PPUV will save you, you probably are still waiting for 1 tenth of a cent per ad credit in Indiana before 2015. I think this remaining group of Jim Jones disciple types needs a new forum. How about MatrixWatch?
The fat lady is warming up her tonsils.
Maybe you shouldn't drink before you write.
drankoolaid
November 13th, 2006, 06:20 PM
Hi i,
You don't stop here that often
but when you do you usually post
some dribble like you did above.
Just curious but why do you bother?
How about enlightening us instead
of posting na na na your mother wears combat
boots and may all your sad lives quickly pass by .
By the way if you are determined to use
outdated political humour to make points
at least using it in proper context! Are you
saying that you are all for 'staying the course?'
Are you saying 'If you ain't with us you're against us?'
Just what exactly ARE you saying?
I would really appreciate a honest to goodness
intelligent post from you stating why it is you
support STAy and Kim Inman -- maybe I'm being
presumptuous in assuming that you do which would
probably make your present stand even more confusing.
You posted three times here at Matrix Watch.
Your tone is usually the same as above --
Here is one of your oldies:
QUOTE i-surrender
What an angry group of people.
Sounds like you all see the world
thru crap colored glasses.
Maybe you all need to get a life.
What would you do all day if you
didn't have YM/ Kim Inman to vilify?
If you are an unhappy member, move on.
I hope the SEC checks out matrix watch.
This is the nastiest forum I have ever seen.
I guess it is good there is a place on the net
for all the discontented people to talk to each other.
Misery does love company and there certainly
seems to be enough company here, though I
do see the same threads by the same few over
and over again.
May it pass quickly if this is how you see life.
END isurrender QUOTE
Read THe Entire (related) Thread Here (http://www.matrixwatch.org/forums/showthread.php?t=4335)
Best Regards,
Michael
Gilbert
November 13th, 2006, 07:35 PM
Maybe you shouldn't drink before you write.
boatman189 - I really don't know how to take that comment.
Maybe you should re-examine the post that prompted your response and give consideration to the post which prompted MY post.
ofd610
November 13th, 2006, 10:27 PM
I got paid .05 this week. I sure am glad. That will make Christmas shopping so much easier. lol
ycchen
November 13th, 2006, 10:45 PM
I got paid .05 this week. I sure am glad. That will make Christmas shopping so much easier. lol Congratulation!! :D
It proves that Kimmy is still paying and not run away with your money! The cheerleaders are right! STA is legit and it is a matter of time to bit Google, Yahoo and Microsoft ...soon .. in the beginning of 3007! :applause: :applause:
very happy
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.