PDA

View Full Version : The Many Faces of Clayton L. Parker


Dreamer
January 30th, 2007, 05:22 PM
I'm not the first one to accuse Clayton of using multiple screen names. But, I suppose he has to since he is getting banned everywhere.

http://talkgold.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1405230#post1405230


Someone needs to point out that "Clayton L. Parker", posting as TSGc above, is now on his fourth username here at TalkGold. Previous usernames were TSG, Ima, & Believer.


Now, Clayton will have you believe that Ima was his daughter or someone. But, posts like this suggests otherwise:

http://www.talkgold.com/forum/showthread.php?p=273682#post273682


TheSAMgroup.net

I have come across them before some time ago, and I want to join the group and I need a password. They did not have a web site when I first found out about them in 2003. Please introduce me!

Claytons daughter came across daddy's site?

Of course the reason for editing this post is interesting: Reason: e-mail changed. I guess it would be difficult to keep an active email when you have hundreds, if not thousands, of people using the same email address.

But then his daughter started using his screen name, since it is so difficult to open up your own account, and signed crap like "I xoxoxoxoxo my daddy". Yeah right.

Also pointed out on another forum that the testimonals are coming from people with no history. Why not ask people involved in his scams who have a history somewhere to post a testimonal to get people like me to shut up? Because they dont exist. Remember, he was promoting his scam to be the backing from if you lost money in scams. But not one person.

When you read these testimonals, read them as a group. They are all written the same style. Typically long winded dribble that Clayton is known for. At first, everyone wanted to chime in about me, having insider information from Clayton himself why he never made good on his word. Then I pointed out he had plenty of time.

So, then all the insults came from everyone. Clayton just loves insulting people. So, look at the posts from that block of time and they all seem to be insulting everyone.

Now, it seems that all the supporters are going on the defensive. One suggested I got paid and ashamed to admit it. We should prove stuff. Im sure there are a few more that I missed from the new long winded dribble coming from his mouth.

Also, every single person uses the exact same stupid language. "earmarked" for whatever. Huh? What does that mean? Why does everyone say "earmarked" instead of saying somethng else?

I know Clayton will come up with another lie to say why this is happening. More power to him. But, look at the people responding to his mulitple personalities. We all have differnet styles of communicating, saying different things, etc. Not one of us sounds the same. But, all of the testimonals sound the same.

seeingeye
January 30th, 2007, 06:16 PM
You have the PERFECT screen name for your post.

Now that I'm where you are posting and reading, will you tell me if you submitted an application to be paid?

I'm only wanting it as proof. Accuse me of anything you want, I don't care. I'm looking for PROOF of him not paying people. All I have of you not being paid is your "word" which to me doesn't mean anything. I want to know if you submitted an application to his group for help. That's all.

What does it matter how many screen names a person has, is that proof of doing something illegal. It makes no sense to me what your are trying to DREAM up to accuse someone of. I have at last count over 12 screen names that I use. One each for my bank accounts which are 9. One here, One for my login at the group, and one I use to receive my personal mail. That doesn't mean I'm doing anything, and your topic is in despiration of anything that PROVES anything.,

I made 6 calls. One to the Sheriff at the courthouse. One to the attorney. One to a jewlery store, one to an accountant, one market, and one drug store. That was six calls. I forgot to tell you that my attorney called his law firm, and ran a background check which did not reveal anything that we did not already know. He has several trucks and trailers leased to a company in Belzoni, MS. We called Mr. Spenser too. He ownes land in Neshoba County and sevral other very expensive pieces of real estate. He has saved people from losing their homes through bankruptsey in his county. My investigative team has talked to his neighbors and nothing bad was derived from it. He held a Top Secret clearance in the military and was decorated with a Silver Star with 4 Oak Leaf Clusters while in Viet Nam. All of that is PROOF of something. You offer NO PROOF of anything other than "dreamed up opinions" and him using screen names. I want REAL proof.

Someone said they could do a GOOGLE search and it would lead them to this forum. They can go directly to his site, and his post will lead them directly to this forum. That's how I got here.

Mr. Dreamer, let's suppose Clayton did make all the post, what does that prove to someone that wants documented PROOF. I've asked you to provide PROOF that you submitted an application just like all the other people that posted that got paid. You are "asleep dreaming" or something and won't or can't answer a simple question.

My due diligence on Mr. Clayton L. Parker shows me that he will not take BS very long from institutions like banks that defraud him, nor will he allow someone to go very long without chasing them down and filing charges against them for the thieft of funds he allowed them to be in control of.

It's a fact he is a plaintiff in the Lloyd's litigation. I talked to Mr. Harris and he confirmed it. It's not of a confidential nature and he simply said, "yes".

I don't think you (especially you) or anyone at this forum is capable of conducting a thorough investigation on him or anyone else. You appear to be grasping at straws and crying like a baby over something that means nothing to you.

I don't think Clayton loves insulting people, he tells it like it is and just so happens most that are making "opinion post" with no PROOF fall into the category of the insult if you look at it that way. I think his insults are humourous.

Again, stop dreaming and provide me with the PROOF that you did fill out an application. It will help me understand what you are trying to do. I think you are hiding something. Or cover up for your lack of common sense.

Your opinion post are like little ole ladies gossoping, that's all the proof you have is hearsay! GIVE ME PROOF and EVIDENCE! I see both PROOF AND EVIDENCE in his favor and nothing against him that has been proven.

The details at his sight are very clear and make clear and decisive sense to a person with normal intelligence. Yet, you say you can not understand it. He has it at the 8th grade level and an 80 IQ level of understanding. He even asks people to read all about him at this forum. And, you know what? They still come back to him to participate in his plans. Now, that is what amazes me! He isn't hiding from anyone or anything.

Stop "dreaming" and provide PROOF of your accuations or you will not convience anyone that you KNOW anything worth listening to.

Marshall

Dreamer
January 30th, 2007, 06:37 PM
Here is one face that just posted above. See if we can get the whole gang here.

Ferret
January 30th, 2007, 10:06 PM
More of Claytons nonsense (http://p207.ezboard.com/fhighyieldfinanceforumsfrm1.showMessage?topicID=36 70.topic&index=14)

Dreamer
February 1st, 2007, 03:52 PM
From another thread posted by concerned to seeingeye who apparently wanted facts.

http://matrixwatch.org/forums/showthread.php?p=48132#post48132

Here are some facts for you.

The following users are all using the same IP addresses that you use.

coppertop
workathomemom


Is that a coincidence that they also support Clayton the same as you?

Ferret
February 1st, 2007, 04:09 PM
From another thread posted by concerned to seeingeye who apparently wanted facts.

http://matrixwatch.org/forums/showthread.php?p=48132#post48132
Don't forget that Coppertop was supposedly replaced by GG who is now using that ID

Dreamer
February 1st, 2007, 06:21 PM
I'll hafta amend this post to find the quote, but lets not forget when someone was busted using an email address that clayton uses, then clayton decides to pretend to use a public email address that millions of people check.

seeingeye
February 1st, 2007, 07:15 PM
My last post.

I have hughesnet uplinks and all IP's go to the same server regardless of where you live in the USA. Clayton has helped several members purchase the uplink. He has a plan for it. It cost me nothing because the equipment was purchased with trust funds. I only pay $35 per month for a $70 service.

Clayton wrote me and asked me to not post here any more, so I'll be just reading the post. You can read what he says about Matrix Watch in the e-mail below and at his entry page at his site. I know he said at the chat room and those that were there understood NOT to come post at this forum any more.

But, to let you know, ....

HIS E-MAIL TO ME IS BELOW.

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:00:11 -0800 (PST)
From: "dirtwater fox" <springcreekfox@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more
Subject: MatrixWatch Post
To: seeingeye@yahoo.com
Greeting George,

I enjoyed our chat in the chat room along with the other members.

I just wanted to ask you to not post at Matrix Watch anymore. You can not reason with the mentally challenged members of that forum. It takes less than a 80 IQ to understand the concept and they freely admit that they can not understand the program or the scope of the program.

My attorney reads my web site and stated at the chat that it's apparant by their post that they aren't even quality members. They are as insignificant as pissants and I'm like him, I wouldn't want anyone of them in my program plans. They don't deserve to be in anything real.

Thanks,

Clayton L. Parker

Ferret
February 1st, 2007, 07:19 PM
http://www.thesamgroup.net

In January 2007, an online bank ... NetBank.com ... froze YOUR accounts. I then contacted them and told them if they did not "un-freeze" YOUR funds that I would BURN their *** faster than they could freeze anymore accounts. It only took me one phone call to convince them to unfreeze YOUR accounts. They KNEW they had a liable suit if they did not comply. By freezing YOUR account, they 'liabled' me! And, I will NOT stand for "educated idiots' with MBA's in economics to insinuate UNPROVEN allegations. I referred them to a link that showed them I will sue them within an inch of their financial life. We are taking Lloyd's bank of London to court in June 07'. It will ruin that bank! www.NetBank.com's legal department then unfroze the accounts and is refunding YOUR monies that they held frozen. I will not let anyone or any agency STEAL you funds as long as I am a part of a transaction with you. My dealings are above board, and comply with the laws of the land. It is the banks that confiscate your property that lose when I become involved with you because they can not STEAL from you while I am involved in the transaction. My plans are REVERSE-CONFISCATION in every aspect of the word. So, it is only natural for banks to not like my plans.

Gringo
February 1st, 2007, 07:52 PM
You can not reason with the mentally challenged members of that forum. It takes less than a 80 IQ to understand the concept and they freely admit that they can not understand the program or the scope of the program.

My attorney reads my web site and stated at the chat that it's apparant by their post that they aren't even quality members. They are as insignificant as pissants and I'm like him, I wouldn't want anyone of them in my program plans. They don't deserve to be in anything real.
It takes a really retarded scammer to try to con members of an anti-scam site into his ponzi.lol

sisco50
February 1st, 2007, 11:43 PM
WOW I will be holding my breath next June to see how it all turns out. Lloyds of London Bank will be ruined? How will I be able to contain myself til next June? lol

Dreamer
February 2nd, 2007, 08:47 AM
http://profiles.yahoo.com/seeingeye

Last Update: 01/28/2007

Doesnt give the creation date, however we can assume one of two things:

1. This email was created on 1/28/2007. Not sure why because they all have a public email they all check. So, why wasnt it to themselves?
2. The profile information was changed on 1/28/2007, deleting all information on the page to hide something.

I'm willing to go with door #1.

As for many computers sharing an IP address because of a server just doesnt sound right. Alot of people connect to AOLs servers and they dont share an IP address. Every computer has a unique IP address, that is how you access your computer online. So, unless someone who knows something about this can verify your claim, I'm just going to have to assume its just another cover up story, because, once again, you got busted.

concerned
February 2nd, 2007, 05:58 PM
My last post.

I have hughesnet uplinks and all IP's go to the same server regardless of where you live in the USA. Clayton has helped several members purchase the uplink. He has a plan for it. It cost me nothing because the equipment was purchased with trust funds. I only pay $35 per month for a $70 service.


Really? Everyone in the USA uses the same server? Why would they allow that? Your internet must be slower than dial up, if they only have 1 server. But this is what puzzles me more. Here is Hughes Net's information.

OrgName: Hughes Network Systems
OrgID: HNS
Address: 11717 Exploration Lane
Address: DirecWAY Network Management Center
Address: attn: Network Security Manager
City: Germantown
StateProv: MD
PostalCode: 20876
Country: US

NetRange: 67.142.0.0 - 67.143.255.255
CIDR: 67.142.0.0/15
NetName: DIRECPC-1BLK
NetHandle: NET-67-142-0-0-1
Parent: NET-67-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS1.DIRECPC.COM
NameServer: NS2.DIRECPC.COM
Comment:
RegDate: 2003-12-12
Updated: 2004-03-04

OrgTechHandle: NSM5-ARIN
OrgTechName: Network Security Manager
OrgTechPhone: +1-301-601-7205
OrgTechEmail: abuse@hughes.net


Look at their range. With that range, they have 130,050 IP addresses. That is a lot of IP addresses running thru 1 server (which is impossible by the way). And with that many IP addresses, how is it possible for you and 2 other people on this forum to have posted not only with 1 same IP address, but 6 IP addresses that you all used. And if they only have 1 server, they only need 1 IP address.


Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:00:11 -0800 (PST)
From: "dirtwater fox" <springcreekfox@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more
Subject: MatrixWatch Post
To: seeingeye@yahoo.com
Greeting George,

I enjoyed our chat in the chat room along with the other members.

I just wanted to ask you to not post at Matrix Watch anymore. You can not reason with the mentally challenged members of that forum. It takes less than a 80 IQ to understand the concept and they freely admit that they can not understand the program or the scope of the program.

My attorney reads my web site and stated at the chat that it's apparant by their post that they aren't even quality members. They are as insignificant as pissants and I'm like him, I wouldn't want anyone of them in my program plans. They don't deserve to be in anything real.

Thanks,

Clayton L. Parker

You had told us at one time that thousands of people have the password to that email address. How do you know Clayton is the one that sent you that email? Isn't it possible that it is one of thousands of people? I would think if it was a publicly used email address, you wouldn't trust anything sent from it, since you don't know who sent the email.

concerned
February 2nd, 2007, 06:01 PM
http://profiles.yahoo.com/seeingeye

Doesnt give the creation date, however we can assume one of two things:

1. This email was created on 1/28/2007. Not sure why because they all have a public email they all check. So, why wasnt it to themselves?
2. The profile information was changed on 1/28/2007, deleting all information on the page to hide something.

I'm willing to go with door #1.

As for many computers sharing an IP address because of a server just doesnt sound right. Alot of people connect to AOLs servers and they dont share an IP address. Every computer has a unique IP address, that is how you access your computer online. So, unless someone who knows something about this can verify your claim, I'm just going to have to assume its just another cover up story, because, once again, you got busted.


Good stuff Dreamer. Here is something else I find ironic. 1/28/2007 is also the same day that seeingeye created his Matrix Watch account.

Dreamer
February 2nd, 2007, 10:23 PM
Here is something else I find ironic. 1/28/2007 is also the same day that seeingeye created his Matrix Watch account.

Which is also after the date that he got busted here for a user using his email address he advertises his scams with, then pretending its a public email account

Priority
February 4th, 2007, 12:08 PM
http://www.thesamgroup.net

For your information I introduced Clayton Parker to the financial institution called "NetBank". I have accounts with them for years! We both had a conversation with the rep of NetBank, and she explained to us in order to make my 5 figure funds transfer to Clayton Parker I would need to do a wire transfer. So Clayton asked her if he could open a joint account and have the funds transfered there, and she replied " yes, the transfer will be much quicker, then sending a wire transfer. So, this is where Clayton got the idea of opening joint accounts with NetBank. It was agreat idea! until NetBank started getting flooded with joint account openings. That is when NetBank security started to freeze the accounts, and my business account being one of them. I contacted NetBank and told them that thier rep from NetBank said we could and that there would be no problem. The security manager said otherwise. So, he ageed to lift the freeze of all the joint accounts with the perswavetion of Clayton and myself for 10 days. Once all the funds were withdrawn he would shut down the accounts.
The whole idea by using the joint account system was a faster way of moving funds from you and to you at later point in time. Well we tried! The banking industry is changing there policies all the time. So now, when I am to receive my funds, I will receive a direct deposit.

Dreamer
February 4th, 2007, 11:50 PM
Posted in the appropriate thread, thanks.